In September, Amazon debuted the Kindle Fire, its first tablet computer, which runs a heavily modified version of the Android mobile operating system, and will compete directly with other Android tablets as well as the iPad. And although the company has created the e-ink Kindle reader, its primary business is in online retail — not hardware manufacturing.
[aditude-amp id="flyingcarpet" targeting='{"env":"staging","page_type":"article","post_id":339708,"post_type":"story","post_chan":"none","tags":null,"ai":false,"category":"none","all_categories":"business,mobile,","session":"D"}']Fusible, which originally spotted that five Kindle Fire products were registered under Seesaw, suggests that Amazon could be setting up a separate company for its tablet business to give it the proper attention.
While this very well may be the case, I think its far more likely a book-keeping tactic. Amazon isn’t a hardware company, and it’s actually taking a $10 loss on each Kindle Fire so that it can push its digital products, like ebooks, music, and more. In this way, the Kindle Fire will still generate money for the company, even though the device itself isn’t profitable.
AI Weekly
The must-read newsletter for AI and Big Data industry written by Khari Johnson, Kyle Wiggers, and Seth Colaner.
Included with VentureBeat Insider and VentureBeat VIP memberships.
Should this strategy fail, Amazon may not want to simply shut down its tablet business. Instead, it might want to sell it off to recuperate some of those expenses, which would be much easier if you’ve already established which parts of the business are separate from the main retail business.
The Kindle Fire won’t make its public debut until mid-November, so we won’t really have an accurate prediction of its success (or failure) for a while.
VentureBeat's mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative enterprise technology and transact. Learn More