AT&T’s customers aren’t the only ones who hated the carrier’s draconian phone unlocking policies. AT&T is now suing three ex-employees for taking part in a massive scheme to unlock thousands of AT&T phones from the inside.
Consumers are legally allowed to request that their carrier unlock their phones — once they’ve been paid off in full — so that the phone can then be connected to a competing carrier’s network. AT&T, however, is known to have the strictest rules of all major carriers for honoring the unlock requests.
[aditude-amp id="flyingcarpet" targeting='{"env":"staging","page_type":"article","post_id":1806080,"post_type":"story","post_chan":"none","tags":null,"ai":false,"category":"none","all_categories":"business,mobile,","session":"D"}']This created a profit motive to enable easier unlocking, and a company called Swift Unlocks, which AT&T is also suing, made a business of unlocking AT&T phones.
AT&T claims Swift Unlocks paid AT&T employee Marc Sapatin $10,500 and Kyra Evans $20,000 to install unlock software in the carrier’s systems while they worked at an AT&T call center in 2013. AT&T claims a third employee, Nguyen Lam, participated, but does not allege he was paid.
AI Weekly
The must-read newsletter for AI and Big Data industry written by Khari Johnson, Kyle Wiggers, and Seth Colaner.
Included with VentureBeat Insider and VentureBeat VIP memberships.
The carrier, the nation’s second largest, says the defendants created a software program that allowed an external server to issue unlock permissions to AT&T phones.
AT&T believes many more people were involved. It claims that 50 “John Doe Defendants” helped develop the unlocking software.
(Read the full lawsuit here.)
Hat tip: Ars Technica
VentureBeat's mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative enterprise technology and transact. Learn More