The company was responding to a Times of London story that suggested Facebook was desperately in need of more servers last year to manage its growth, and that it was forced to sell a ten percent stake to Greylock Partners — in order to get cash. Greylock partner David Sze, a board member told VentureBeat the firm does not own ten percent, and that the firm’s investment last year did not come because of a need for servers. When asked what parts to the Times report were inaccurate, he said “all of it,” calling the paper’s reporting “amazing.”
[aditude-amp id="flyingcarpet" targeting='{"env":"staging","page_type":"article","post_id":18804,"post_type":"story","post_chan":"none","tags":null,"ai":false,"category":"none","all_categories":"business,","session":"A"}']He continued: “A site like Facebook is always adding servers to support its growth. But there certainly was no panic reaction to run for funding as the article implies. I wish there had been! It would have made my life easier in doing the deal!”
We covered Greylock’s investment last year. Before Greylock’s lead of that $25 million round, Facebook had raised $12.7 million in a round led by Accel Partners.
AI Weekly
The must-read newsletter for AI and Big Data industry written by Khari Johnson, Kyle Wiggers, and Seth Colaner.
Included with VentureBeat Insider and VentureBeat VIP memberships.
Going forward, we’ll try to avoid dispelling erroneous reports by other publications. This one seemed particularly nasty, however, calling Facebook’s server problem a “major stuff up,” citing two anonymous sources. It is relevant only in that Facebook continues to face challenges keeping up with demand from outside developers to access its platform.
VentureBeat's mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative enterprise technology and transact. Learn More