(UPDATED at 11am PT on Sunday, 8/26/07: See below.)
Featured companies: Clinical Data, Epidauros Biotechnologie, Precision Therapeutics, UMD, Zars Pharma
[aditude-amp id="flyingcarpet" targeting='{"env":"staging","page_type":"article","post_id":27120,"post_type":"story","post_chan":"none","tags":null,"ai":false,"category":"none","all_categories":"business,","session":"A"}']UMD to close $8M for menstrual pain and osteoporosis — Cincinnati’s UMD, a developer of vaginal drug-delivery technologies, expects to close up to $8 million in a fifth funding round, VentureWire reports (subscription required). The company has backing from an undisclosed new investor, and expects former investors Charter Life Sciences and Asset Management to join the round.
UMD is developing a new version of an off-patent anti-inflammatory drug called ketorolac that can be administered on the end of a tampon for menstrual pain, and hopes to begin mid-stage human tests this year. It plans a similar delivery formulation for the active ingredient in Merck’s osteoporosis drug Fosamax, which loses patent protection this year. The company doesn’t have a Web site.
AI Weekly
The must-read newsletter for AI and Big Data industry written by Khari Johnson, Kyle Wiggers, and Seth Colaner.
Included with VentureBeat Insider and VentureBeat VIP memberships.
This is a fairly low-tech sort of diagnostic — as its filing makes clear, Precision basically just removes tumor cells and then starts hitting them with various drugs in the laboratory to see whether they live or die. The company has only been marketing its current test, which it calls ChemoFx, for the last year or so; although it has had ChemoFx on the market since 1997, it ceased sales activity in 2003 and didn’t resume it until last year. Revenues have been predictably anemic, as until recently Precision didn’t have an active sales force, and last year the company managed the feat of posting a gross loss, in which its cost of sales in terms of lab expenses exceeded incoming revenue.
There’s other bad news, too. Precision notes that two respected organizations — the technology-evaluation center of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association and a working group of the American Society of Clinical Oncology — concluded in 2004 that “chemosensitivity/chemoresistance assays” such as ChemoFx lacked supporting data that would justify their routine use.
The company also parses several complex reimbursement decisions in a fairly convincing illustration of the risk that relatively few insurers may actually want to pay for its test. It further notes that clinical data supporting use of its test is “limited,” and although it cites the results of three studies carried out between 2002 and 2006, none of them look particularly convincing. In one of the few bright spots in its filing, Precision says it is currently conducting five additional studies, some of which appear to be fairly rigorous “prospective” studies of the diagnostic.
[aditude-amp id="medium1" targeting='{"env":"staging","page_type":"article","post_id":27120,"post_type":"story","post_chan":"none","tags":null,"ai":false,"category":"none","all_categories":"business,","session":"A"}']
UPDATE (11am PT on Sunday, 8/26/07): Added Clinical Data/Epidauros item.
VentureBeat's mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative enterprise technology and transact. Learn More