One of the biggest problems with Amazon and Google’s recently released cloud music players is the need to upload music into a digital locker. Apple will eliminate this need, at least partially. The iCloud service will scan a customer’s music library in iTunes and mirror the collection on its own servers. If the track is not available in the iTunes Store or can’t be recognized, it would then have to be uploaded by the user.
[aditude-amp id="flyingcarpet" targeting='{"env":"staging","page_type":"article","post_id":297128,"post_type":"story","post_chan":"none","tags":null,"ai":false,"category":"none","all_categories":"business,cloud,mobile,","session":"C"}']Another great function of the iCloud service will be the ability to stream music at the same quality as iTunes Plus songs (256kbps AAC) even if the user encoded songs in his or her library as lower-quality MP3 or AAC tracks.
A week ago we heard that Apple had reached a cloud music deal with Sony, EMI, and Warner Music Group but was still trying to finalize a deal with Universal.
AI Weekly
The must-read newsletter for AI and Big Data industry written by Khari Johnson, Kyle Wiggers, and Seth Colaner.
Included with VentureBeat Insider and VentureBeat VIP memberships.
While both Amazon and Google have debuted cloud music services, neither company has been able to reach an agreement with music labels. Since Apple’s iTunes sits at the top of the digital music food chain, I fully expect it to be the first company to reach a wide-ranging agreement with all the major music labels on cloud music services.
What do you think about the iCloud service? Would you use it? Would you buy more music because of it?
VentureBeat's mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative enterprise technology and transact. Learn More