Corporate acquisitions of startups usually fail. Here’s why

For decades, large companies have gone shopping in Silicon Valley for startups. Lately, the pressure of continuous disruption has forced them to step up the pace.

More often than not, the results of these acquisitions are disappointing.

[aditude-amp id="flyingcarpet" targeting='{"env":"staging","page_type":"article","post_id":1458753,"post_type":"guest","post_chan":"none","tags":null,"ai":false,"category":"none","all_categories":"entrepreneur,","session":"B"}']

What can companies learn from others’ failed efforts to integrate startups into large companies? The answer: There are two types of integration strategies, and they depend on where the startup is in its lifecycle.

The innovation portfolio

Most large companies manage three types of innovation: process innovation (making existing products incrementally better), continuous innovation (building on the strength of the company’s current business model but creating new elements), and disruptive innovation (creating products or services that did not exist before.)

Companies manage these three types of innovation with an innovation portfolio. Either they build innovation internally, they buy it, or they partner with resources outside their company.

Five types of innovation to buy

If they decide to buy, large companies can:

1. license/acquire intellectual property
2. acquire startups for their teams (and discard the product)
3. buy out another company’s product line for the product
4. acquire a company for the product and its installed base of users
5. buy out an entire company for its revenue and profits

Silicon Valley: a corporate candy store

Corporate business development and strategic partner executives are flocking to Silicon Valley to find these five types of innovation.

[aditude-amp id="medium1" targeting='{"env":"staging","page_type":"article","post_id":1458753,"post_type":"guest","post_chan":"none","tags":null,"ai":false,"category":"none","all_categories":"entrepreneur,","session":"B"}']

In response, venture capital firms like Sequoia and Andreessen/Horowitz are hiring new partners just to work with their portfolio companies and match them to corporations. They are actively organizing annual and quarterly activities to bring the portfolio and Fortune 500 decision makers together  in both large events and one-on-one visits. The goal is to get a corporate investment or an outright acquisition of the startup.

VCs like acquisitions as much as IPOs because the acquiring companies often can rationalize paying large multiples over the current valuation of the startup. For acquirers, this math makes sense, since they can factor in the potential impact the startup has when combined with their existing business. However, these nosebleed valuations make it even more important in getting the acquired company integrated correctly. The common mistake acquirers make is treating all acquisitions the same.

Is the potential acquisition searching or executing?

Not all new ventures are at the same stage of maturity. Remember, the definition of a startup is a temporary organization designed to search for a repeatable and scalable business model.

A business model is all the parts of a strategy necessary to deliver a product to a customer and make money from it. These include the product itself, the customer, the distribution channel, revenue model, how to get, keep and grow customers, resources and activities needed to build the business, and costs.

[aditude-amp id="medium2" targeting='{"env":"staging","page_type":"article","post_id":1458753,"post_type":"guest","post_chan":"none","tags":null,"ai":false,"category":"none","all_categories":"entrepreneur,","session":"B"}']

Startups are those companies that are still in the process of searching for a business model. Ventures that are further along and, now executing their business model, are no longer startups; they are now early-stage companies.

Large corporations come to the Valley looking to acquire both startups which are searching for a business model and early-stage companies which are executing.

Companies that acquire startups for their intellectual property, teams, or product lines are acquiring startups that are still searching for a business model. If they acquire later stage companies who already have users/customers and/or a predictable revenue stream, they are acquiring companies which are executing.

[aditude-amp id="medium3" targeting='{"env":"staging","page_type":"article","post_id":1458753,"post_type":"guest","post_chan":"none","tags":null,"ai":false,"category":"none","all_categories":"entrepreneur,","session":"B"}']

What gets lost when a large company looks at the rationale for an acquisition (IP, team, product, users) is that startups are run by founders searching for a business model. The founding team is testing for the right combination of product, market, revenue, costs, etc. They do it with a continual customer discovery process, iterating, pivoting and building incremental MVP’s.

This phase of a new venture is chaotic and unpredictable with very few processes, procedures, or formal hierarchy. At this stage, the paramount goal of the startup management team is to find product/market fit and a business model that can scale before they run out of cash.

This search phase is driven by the startup culture, which encourages individual initiative and autonomy and creates a shared esprit de corps that results in the passionate and relentless pursuit of opportunity. This is the antithesis of the process, procedures, and rules that make up large companies.

In contrast, early-stage companies that have found product/market fit are now in execution mode, scaling their organization and customer base. While they still may share the same passion as a startup, the goal is now scale.

[aditude-amp id="medium4" targeting='{"env":"staging","page_type":"article","post_id":1458753,"post_type":"guest","post_chan":"none","tags":null,"ai":false,"category":"none","all_categories":"entrepreneur,","session":"B"}']

Since scale and execution require repeatable processes and procedures, these companies have begun to replace their chaotic early days with org charts, HR manuals, revenue plans, budgets, key performance indicators, and other tools that allow measurement and control of a growing business. And as part of their transition to predictable processes, their founders may or may not still be at the helm. Often they have brought in an operating executive as the new CEO.

Predicting success of failure of an acquisition

So what? Who cares whether a potential acquisition is searching or executing?

Ironically, the business development and strategic partner executives who find the startup and negotiate the deal are not the executives who manage the integration or the acquisition. Usually, it’s up to the CTO or the operating executive who wanted the innovative technology (and, at times, with a formal HR integration process) to decide the fate of the startup inside the acquiring company.

It turns out the success of the acquisition depends on whether the acquiring company intends to keep the new venture as a standalone division or integrate and assimilate it into the corporation.

[aditude-amp id="medium5" targeting='{"env":"staging","page_type":"article","post_id":1458753,"post_type":"guest","post_chan":"none","tags":null,"ai":false,"category":"none","all_categories":"entrepreneur,","session":"B"}']

There is a simple heuristic to guide this decision.

If the startup is being acquired for its intellectual property and/or team, the right strategy is to integrate and assimilate it quickly. The rest is just overhead surrounding what is the core value to the acquiring company.

However, if the startup is still in search mode and you want the product line and users to grow at its current pace or faster, keep the startup as an independent division and appoint the existing CEO as the division head.

Given that startups in this stage are chaotic and that the speed of innovation depends on preserving a culture that is driven by autonomy and initiative, insulate the acquisition as much as possible from the corporate overhead.

Unless you want to stop innovation in your new acquisition dead in its tracks, do not pile on the corporate KPI’s, processes, and procedures. Provide the existing CEO with a politically savvy “corporate concierge” to access the acquiring company’s resources to further accelerate growth.

(It helps if the acquirer has incentives for its existing employees that tie the new acquisition’s success to those that help them.)

The key insight here is that for a startup still searching for a business model, corporate processes and policies will kill innovation and drive the employees responsible for innovation out of the acquired company before the startup’s optimal value can be realized.

If the acquisition is in execution mode, the right model is to integrate and assimilate it. Combine its emerging corporate KPI’s, processes, and procedures with those of the acquiring company. Unless it’s the rare founder who secretly loves processes and procedures, transition the existing CEO to a corporate innovation group or an exit.

Lessons Learned

• Corporate acquirers need to know what they’re buying: is their acquisition searching or executing?
• If the startup is acquired for its IP, talent, or revenue, it should be rapidly integrated into the acquirer.
• If the startup is acquired for its products and/or users, preserve its startup culture by keeping it an independent unit.
  • Appoint a “corporate concierge” to access the acquiring company’s resources.
  • Incentive programs need to tie together the new acquisition’s continued success and the rest of the company.
• Acquirers need a formal integration and on-boarding process.

This story originally appeared on Steve Blank. Copyright 2014