Mobile storefronts are an alluring frontier, rife with exploratory potential in every direction.
Quality can oscillate wildly between the next great idea in portable play, and uncaring designers spitting out the flimsiest asset dumps known to man. I have once again assembled my Samsung-provided arsenal of a Galaxy S6, S6 Edge Plus, and Galaxy Tab S2 to unearth more games from the Android app store wilds. On this digital dig, I uncover a battle between hulked-out deities, the world’s saddest city, and more. Join me, won’t you?
This is my seventh time venturing into the Samsung unknown, so be sure to catch up on everything you might have missed (parts one, two, three, four, five, and six) before we venture out on this latest leg of the journey.
Fight against the angry, buff Greek pantheon in Gods of Rome
Greek gods have never needed a reason to beat the holy crap out of each other. So I found it odd when Gods of Rome, a swipe-to-fight brawler featuring a cast of well-known of deities both from inside and outside of Greek myth, forced a plot about a son of Hades taking over the Olympians’ minds with a magical MacGuffin. Nitpick aside, once these behemoths did start fighting, I found plenty to enjoy.
AI Weekly
The must-read newsletter for AI and Big Data industry written by Khari Johnson, Kyle Wiggers, and Seth Colaner.
Included with VentureBeat Insider and VentureBeat VIP memberships.
And behemoth is the proper word here. Gods of Rome went the “Gods are just really big and sexy humanoids” route, giving us a cast of super-beefy fighters, even by video game standards. The bodybuilder physiques — along with the vibrant stages and bombastic “ultra” attacks from each brawler– give each fight an appreciable level of bombast. Too bad most players will win all the early matches by just furiously tapping the screen. The solo campaign’s need to extend its drainage of free in-game energy compounds this problem, with stages and fighters being constantly repeated throughout the campaign. But the game does eventually force at least some usage of the full range of all fast-medium-heavy attacks, as well as dodging and blocking.
Navigating the user interface outside of combat never stops being aggravating. Gods of Rome feels like its overcompensating in many ways, and the cluttering of screen real estate with real-time player chats and timed event information makes the whole community surrounding the game feel forced upon players. It’s as if the developers manufactured a few hundred “player” accounts and are masquerading them as player conversation to perpetuate a sense of social activity larger than anything that occurs naturally.
But the combat is satisfying enough for a mobile experience to negate most of my other concerns. Gods of Rome is best when two impossibly thick dudes are smacking each other with weighty fists, and that sort of thing is in ready supply.
Best played on: Samsung Galaxy Tab S2.
Potion Pop fails to cast the simplest charm
I wouldn’t surprise me if more cellphones owners have played a match-3 puzzle game with cartoon characters and melodramatic particle effects than have opened up a calculator app. Despite mindless, brightly colored sliding puzzle games inundating every single digital phone marketplace, productions like Potion Pop are still seeing development and release.
I found nothing glaringly dysfunctional in this magical adventure of an elf-thing trying to save the world (probably) from an evil owl that casts dark magic rain (I think?) all over the land of Unnamed Peacefulhappytownsville. But this me-too production has no reason to exist other than a cheap profit turnover through microtransactions and repetitive puzzle algorithms. To play Potion Pop is to engage in the same microobjectives of “get X amount of Y potion,” “break through X barrier in Y amount of moves,” and “score X amount” as in every other match-3 puzzle game made in the last half decade. For those that managed to avoid a match-3 puzzler until now, dozens of better alternatives exist.
Potion Pop lacks anything unique or even enjoyable to qualify its existence outside of a spreadsheet.
Best played on: A machine that refuses to run any other match-3 puzzle game, somehow.
Tap out your generic fantasy heroics in Kings Road
Kings Road exists in an peculiar state: It has everything going for it except momentum. It has all of the components for an engaging action role-playing experience, particularly given its competition in the free-to-play market. Each of the three playable classes (warrior, archer, wizard) eventually grow to allow a satisfying degree of flexibility in playstyle through their allotted skill sets. A wizard with multiple spells can put up a different kind of ranged combat than an archer with several kinds of arrow attacks.
But to get to a point of minute-to-minute satisfaction, you have to force yourself from an exceedingly boring tutorial to a rigidly linear first few levels of character progression. Its quality curve feels utterly in opposition to the average first play session of mobile players, only presenting some noteworthy play time after most users would have reasonably given up and moved onto other things. All of this is only exacerbated by a barely there story ripped from so many adventure and fantasy cliches it comes off as painted by numbers rather than written.
All of Kings Road’s best qualities sit just out of the scope of the average mobile player’s patience, and the game provides no reason to hold out beyond the tepid introductory levels.
Best played on: the last week before an “Intro to Fantasy Tropes” midterm.
Airport City is the most boring episode of the Twilight Zone
To say something is “like The Twilight Zone” is to usually be making a reference to the best elements of the classic ’60s science-fiction show: high-concept stories with big plot twists and less-than-subtle social commentary thrown in. But Airport City feels like one of the The Twilight Zone‘s awful episodes, where the character encounters wide spaces devoid of all life and purpose and the plot twist wasn’t even worth it.
In this case, the wide space is Airport City, another town-building simulation such as Megapolis, 2020: My Country, etc. Airport City’s entire economy runs through (unsurprisingly) its airport. This eventually leads — as you tap and wait a few dozen times for various buildings to pop up and timer bars to complete — to a population made entirely of tutorial character art and tap-able suitcase icons eating at generic family restaurants in between constant mass trips to Not Airport City. After a short while, you will have a densely populated stretch of land filled with sad digital people living out a life of perpetual commute to nameless places off screen.
The big plot twist here is that you — a sentient human being — have wasted time and energy on creating this realm of pointless, constant transit.
Best played on: your worst night of insomnia.
Peek not into the void of Solitaire Stars, lest it look back
Nothing can be quite as unintentionally disarming as a complete lack of sound. I don’t think the designers of Solitaire Stars, a tournament-based affair that centers on a card game that derives its name from a synonym for “alone,” intended to make the most unnerving take on solitaire possible. It doesn’t have a single sound effect or musical cue, so the icon boxes of your opponent (reportedly playing the same deck as you simultaneously) seem to loom at you, ready to pounce. As if they are keeping you occupied as they clean their torture room of the residue of the hapless player before.
The core of the game is about as basic an approximation of the Saddest Card Game Ever as you can find. Stack the bland-looking cards in order from Kings to 2s, flipping through the deck when you run out of options on the table. The game will even automatically file cards on the stacks at the top of screen for you, and at such a speed as to make the joy of discovering those long-hidden cards almost moot.
The most accurate comparison that I can draw to Solitaire Stars is to those “screamer” videos that used to be all over Youtube. Because after five minutes of staring intently at tiny cards in a dull, soundless landscape, I was nearly flung from my chair by the blaring audio of the ad interruption.
Best played on: the elevator ride into Purgatory.
Crossy Road offers little, but served on the best possible platter
Too few free-to-play mobile titles seem to actually appreciate video games as much as Crossy Road does. The simple crossing-the-frantic-highway simulator wears its arcade era-inspirations proudly. Most obviously, Road’s blocky art style approximates an old school pixelated look relatively well, updated with modern lighting effects and bouncy animations. The effect is not dissimilar to From Software’s 3D Dot Game Heroes, the studio’s 2009 tribute to classic entries in The Legend of Zelda franchise.
But Crossy Road walks the arcade walk as well, demanding the player perform a simple task with precision despite escalating challenge. Crossing this neverending highway demands increasingly precise timing, with an increasing amount of obstacles of varying speeds looking to flatten you into adorable mush. The goal never really fluctuates, at least in the hour’s worth of attempts I made, but the game nevertheless retains a “one more try” feel thanks to an immediate restart and a throng of different characters to work toward unlocking.
Crossy Road is also one of the few games I have ever encountered with a Pac-Man gameplay variant, complete with power pellets to pick up and blitz your way through now-vulnerable ghosts. More games should make include such an option.
Best played on: the Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Plus.
VentureBeat's mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative enterprise technology and transact. Learn More