Skip to main content [aditude-amp id="stickyleaderboard" targeting='{"env":"staging","page_type":"article","post_id":753334,"post_type":"story","post_chan":"none","tags":null,"ai":false,"category":"none","all_categories":"security,","session":"C"}']

Larry Page & Google’s legal chief talk about the company’s involvement in PRISM

Image Credit: Dylan Tweney/VentureBeat

Google CEO Larry Page looks to the sky

Google CEO Larry Page and the company’s chief legal officer, David Drummond, have issued a statement about PRISM, an alleged government program for digital spying via backdoor access to company servers.

[aditude-amp id="flyingcarpet" targeting='{"env":"staging","page_type":"article","post_id":753334,"post_type":"story","post_chan":"none","tags":null,"ai":false,"category":"none","all_categories":"security,","session":"C"}']

Briefly, PRISM refers to slides obtained by the Washington Post that appear to talk about a secret government program wherein web companies gave (or were strongarmed into giving) NSA and FBI direct connections into their data enters.

Yesterday, a slew of companies, including Google, issued specific denials not only that they had participated in PRISM but also that they had any knowledge of PRISM’s existence.

AI Weekly

The must-read newsletter for AI and Big Data industry written by Khari Johnson, Kyle Wiggers, and Seth Colaner.

Included with VentureBeat Insider and VentureBeat VIP memberships.

Today, Page and Drummond took the statements a step further on the company blog in a post entitled “What the …?”

From the post:

First, we have not joined any program that would give the U.S. government—or any other government—direct access to our servers. … We had not heard of a program called PRISM until yesterday.

Second, we provide user data to governments only in accordance with the law. Our legal team reviews each and every request, and frequently pushes back when requests are overly broad or don’t follow the correct process.

That second bit refers to Google’s longstanding history of transparency reports, which give details on all the subpoenas and warrants the company receives from governments and law enforcement agencies requesting user data.

“But,” the post concludes, “the level of secrecy around the current legal procedures undermines the freedoms we all cherish.”

There’s been quite a bit of speculation that Google and the other companies involved may be operating under a gag order from the U.S. government, under which they wouldn’t be permitted to discuss PRISM at all. But whatever the truth is in this case, we’ve got a long way to go before we get to the bottom of it, and even a blog post co-written by Larry Page isn’t going to satisfy anyone in a “He said, She said” story about government spying.

Image credit: Dylan Tweney/VentureBeat

[aditude-amp id="medium1" targeting='{"env":"staging","page_type":"article","post_id":753334,"post_type":"story","post_chan":"none","tags":null,"ai":false,"category":"none","all_categories":"security,","session":"C"}']

VentureBeat's mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative enterprise technology and transact. Learn More