Five disgruntled Facebook users have forced the social network to change how it manages its popular Sponsored Stories ad units.
[aditude-amp id="flyingcarpet" targeting='{"env":"staging","page_type":"article","post_id":478677,"post_type":"story","post_chan":"none","tags":null,"ai":false,"category":"none","all_categories":"social,","session":"A"}']The users, two of whom are minors, sought class-action status in a lawsuit against Facebook for using their names and faces in ad units without their consent, a violation of California law.
The suit, already in the settlement stages, as previously reported by VentureBeat, is costing Facebook $10 million in charity donations and up to $300,000 in legal fees. But that’s not all.
AI Weekly
The must-read newsletter for AI and Big Data industry written by Khari Johnson, Kyle Wiggers, and Seth Colaner.
Included with VentureBeat Insider and VentureBeat VIP memberships.
In a proposal filed Wednesday (embedded below), Facebook said that it would create new mechanisms to give members more insight into and control over the interactions, a.k.a. their status updates and “likes,” that have been used in Sponsored Stories.
But this isn’t a global opt-out option for Sponsored Stories. Instead, the language in the settlement puts forth a far more granular solution. The suggested controls will only apply to individual interactions or categories of interactions, which means users won’t be getting a broad, all-encompassing on-off switch.
“Facebook will create an easily accessible mechanism that enables users to view the subset of their interactions and other content that have been displayed in Sponsored Stories,” the company said in the settlement proposal. “Facebook will further engineer settings to enable users, upon viewing the interactions and other content that have been used in Sponsored Stories, to control which of these interactions and other content are eligible to appear in additional Sponsored Stories. Without limiting the foregoing, but for the sake of clarity, these settings will include the ability to enable users to prevent individual interactions and other content (or categories of interactions and other content) from appearing in additional Sponsored Stories.”
The company also said that it would revise its terms of use for minors and require parental approval before showing a minor’s name alongside an ad. In the settlement, Facebook committed to providing parents with easier access to info and links so that they can prevent their children’s names from appearing alongside ads.
It’s unclear how the changes will affect Facebook’s advertising business. Should members take advantage of the new controls en masse, Sponsored Stories, which appeal to advertisers because of the native member endorsements, would likely see fewer buyers.
The total value of the settlement, including the $10 million contribution and legal fees, is estimated to be $103.2 million.
[aditude-amp id="medium1" targeting='{"env":"staging","page_type":"article","post_id":478677,"post_type":"story","post_chan":"none","tags":null,"ai":false,"category":"none","all_categories":"social,","session":"A"}']
Facebook declined to comment on this story.
[via Reuters]
VentureBeat's mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative enterprise technology and transact. Learn More